Hi-it was 45%

@Renmure-Jim said in Remaining ISA allowance bug in the system?: I’ve taken advantage of the flexible ISA a couple of times for significant purchases within a tax year and found the withdrawing and repaying to be pretty simple and intuitive. I'll second this. Most ISA providers don't offer flexible ISA's (my previous ISA provider didn't even know what one was.) This was a major factor in me moving my ISA to IM a few years ago.

Hi D, Netflix is set to drop its Q1 2025 earnings after the market shuts on 17 April. Analysts expect earnings per share (EPS) will hit $5.74, up 8.7% from $5.28 last year, with revenue expected at $10.54 billion, a 12.5% jump year-on-year. That’s pretty close to Netflix’s own forecast of $10.46 billion in revenue and an operating margin of 28.2%. They’ve got a history of smashing EPS forecasts, beating expectations in all four of the last reported quarters, like Q4 2024 when they pulled off $4.27 against $4.20 expected. That said, it's hard to know but their numbers should be solid. Everyone’s eyeing their ad-supported memberships, which made up 55% of sign-ups in ad markets last quarter, and their content line-up, with several content hits. They won’t disclose subscriber numbers anymore, focusing on revenue and margins instead.

Samsung announce delays in qualification of HBM3E memory, pushing back their production until at least Q4-an excellent update for Micron which is in mass production.

Email sent to Nik

Thanks from me also!

Minor update: remember that token £1 which I moved to Schwab's UK bank account? It arrived back in our UK bank account yesterday, with a message saying something like "Transaction bounced". I guess something went wrong somewhere so I'll chalk this one up as 'one of those things' and have another go (perhaps). Perhaps with £100 this time, which is hopefully enough not to get lost. Thanks for your help.

You aren't wrong O! How can the West compete when, for example, we have min wages/conditions, limits on fossil fuel use and regulations which others may even sign up to but simple ignore them. It's not a level playing field. We could go on however this is a great job for DT to get stuck into And fishing vessels that catch more fibre optic cables than fish

We will be making two changes to the portfolios next week(2 new stocks)-not sure of exact timing. Treat this as aheads up of an impending rebalance across Lifestyle/Tech

Earlier week at the Open AI summit, OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman said their next advancement(Model) released in 2025 will be more disruptive than most people expect. 'The industry will see the first examples of AGI in 2025 and will use different tools to achieve complete it. Alman added that initially the impact on humanity will be minimal but in time will become intense. 'In 2025 we will have systems that people will say 'wow, this changes what I expected'. Altman added that in time AGI will bring significant human job displacement. It will be transformative to economies.

Thanks for the super quick response Adam

Thank you Nik and Adam for the clarifications on this subject which hopefully will be helpful to others as well. I have funds in GIA which, between my OH and myself, we may not spend all in our lifetime so would look to leave this to our son in the future. It's a fine balancing act between whether to annually make withdrawals to fund the £20,000 ISA allowance or just withdraw up to the piddly £3000 annual gains allowance (e.g. £15,000 withdrawal if gains are 25% - £12,000 capital + £3000 gain). This saves the hassle of doing a tax return since my pension is PAYE so HMRC adjusts my allowance for interest income annually. Who knows, the govt may change this in future but it would seem harsh to pay gains tax followed by IHT.

Here is the compute comparison. One rack = the entire DC. The DC cost 3b usd to build and 150m annually to operate excluding the land/lease The single rack costs 30m and 12m to operate annually. Could live in a broom closet [image: 1742381904418-screen-shot-2025-03-19-at-10.52.08.png]

Medpace I did mention it here and an email will go out, probably next week

FWIW, it seems to me that in the world of investing then taking our hands off the wheel is often the route to the best results. On that basis then a slight hiatus is perhaps no bad thing, presuming that we all remain invested in the things that we thought worthwhile in the first place.

Thanks again Adam - email sent.

@Nik-Burrows Thanks Nik. Son 2 needs one soon so will look and see what exists

Alphabet GAAP EPS of $2.81 beats by $0.80, revenue of $90.23B beats by $1.08B Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company, delivered a stellar Q1 2025 earnings report, showcasing robust financial performance. Revenue reached $90.23 billion, up 12% from $80.54 billion in Q1 2024, exceeding analyst expectations of $89.1 billion. Diluted earnings per share soared 49% to $2.81, surpassing forecasts of $2.01, driven by an $8b unrealised gain on non-marketable securities (stocks/investments). Operating income climbed 20% to $30.61 billion, with the operating margin expanding to 33.9% from 31.6%, reflecting disciplined cost management despite a 14% rise in R&D spending to $13.56 billion. Google Cloud was a standout, with revenue up 28% to $12.26 billion and operating margin nearly doubling to 17.8% from 9.4%. Alphabet announced a $70 billion share buyback programme and a $0.21 per share dividend, reinforcing shareholder returns. Capital expenditure was confirmed at $75 billion for 2025, a 43% increase from $52.5 billion in 2024, primarily for AI-driven infrastructure like servers and data centres, with $16–18 billion earmarked for Q1 alone. CEO Sundar Pichai attributed the strong results to Alphabet’s “unique full stack approach to AI,” highlighting breakthroughs with Gemini 2.5 and AI Overviews, which now serves 1.5 billion monthly users. CFO Anat Ashkenazi emphasised sustained investment in technical infrastructure to bolster cloud and AI capabilities, noting that costs grew slower than revenue, enhancing efficiency [image: 1745564682098-screenshot-2025-04-25-at-07.51.54.png] [image: 1745564695087-screenshot-2025-04-25-at-07.52.11.png]

Sorry I meant 20% not 25%

The drug cost > $1B to develop so the price (in the US $3.1M) needs to recover this cost and make a profit. Sickle Cell disease is a terrible illness(genetic) often leading to poor quality of life and shortened life expectancy . Many who suffer from it have regular hospitalisation so you need to factor in the large cost over a number of years vs the upfront cost now coupled with the pain and suffering. The reality is, you've read the headline. They will probably only process a handful of patients a year-there will be a budget. Vertex is not like most drug companies. Their charter is to work in the field of transformative medicines. Medicines that improve healthcare outcomes through discovery and technology. The hard stuff.